![Moving from SQL 2005 [SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS] to 2008 - will I lose any features by using 'backwards compatibility' - Database Administrators Stack Exchange Moving from SQL 2005 [SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS] to 2008 - will I lose any features by using 'backwards compatibility' - Database Administrators Stack Exchange](https://i.stack.imgur.com/o6TsD.jpg)
Moving from SQL 2005 [SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS] to 2008 - will I lose any features by using 'backwards compatibility' - Database Administrators Stack Exchange
![Can SQL Server SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS be safely converted to Latin1_General_CI_AS? - Stack Overflow Can SQL Server SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS be safely converted to Latin1_General_CI_AS? - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AoUgT.png)
Can SQL Server SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS be safely converted to Latin1_General_CI_AS? - Stack Overflow
![sql server - Get structure of temp table (like generate sql script) and clear temp table for current instance - Stack Overflow sql server - Get structure of temp table (like generate sql script) and clear temp table for current instance - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/gISNp.png)
sql server - Get structure of temp table (like generate sql script) and clear temp table for current instance - Stack Overflow
![sql server - SQL Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Arabic_100_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation - Stack Overflow sql server - SQL Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Arabic_100_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/8zH4g.png)